Regionalisation in the Czech and Slovak Republics
Comparing the Influence of the European Union. Position by Martin Brusis
The Regional Challenge in Central and Eastern Europe, Territorial Restructuring and European Integration, edited by Michael Keating and James Hughes. Paris, Presses interuniversitaires européennes / Peter Lang 2003: pages 89-105.
23.10.2003 · Bertelsmann Forschungsgruppe Politik
|< Vorige News||Nächste News >|
It is asked whether and how these different conditions cause a substantial, formative impact of the EU on the process, politics and institutional outcomes of the reform of regional-level administration in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In both republics, regional bodies of state administration were dissolved in Czechoslovak times. Thus, reformers in both countries faced similar tasks of re-building the regional level in the context of the reform of public administration, and. As a part of this regionalisation, the Czech Republic and Slovakia established the legal foundations of regional self-governments in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Both countries have to meet largely similar requirements of accession and implementing the acquis. In contrast with the Czech Republic, Slovakia was strongly criticised by the EU due to the undemocratic style of Vladimír Meciars government (1994-1998) and, in 1997, it was classified by the EU as the only accession country not fulfilling the accession criterion of democratic stability. Both countries differ significantly in the constellations of political actors that have emerged since the democratic transition.
The paper finds a strong EU impact as far as (1) mandatory legislation and (2) the general orientation, receptiveness towards the EU/Europe in public discourse is concerned. While the EU has effected an institutional harmonisation where mandatory rules exist, the Union has hitherto not induced changes that made Czech and Slovak regional administration more similar than before. EU impact has been modest with respect to the sequencing of legislation and the changes of behaviour of political actors in crucial moments of the reforms. Despite its considerable impact on the public discourse, the EU has not substantially altered the behaviour of political actors who have retained their main objectives and have taken into account the EU only as an additional component of their wider assessment of the political constellation. Major aims of the reforms of public administration - decentralisation, regional self-government and a new territorial-administrative division were not suggested or altered by the EU.
News zum Thema
Die Test-Seminare waren ein voller Erfolg
19.02.2021 · C·A·P
Alexander Graf Lambsdorff: Wenn Elefanten kämpfen. Rezension von Prof. Dr. Werner Weidenfeld
14.02.2021 · Süddeutsche Zeitung
Interview mit Prof. Dr. Werner Weidenfeld
08.02.2021 · rbb inforadio
Zoom-Webinar am 25.02.2021 mit einem Impulsvortrag von Professor Dr. Werner Weidenfeld
04.02.2021 · C·A·P
Statements von Eva Feldmann-Wojtachnia