C·A·P Home > Aktuell > Events > 2007 > Regional integration in Europe and Asia

Regional integration in Europe and Asia

Lessons from the EU and ASEAN

19.03.2007 · C·A·P & Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung


< Vorige NewsNächste News >

On March 15th, the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have celebrated in Nuremberg 30 years of formal EU-ASEAN relations, 40 years of ASEAN and 50 years since the signing of the Rome Treaties. In the Nuremberg Declaration on an EU-ASEAN enhanced partnership, which was adopted in the framework of the 16th EU-ASEAN foreign ministers meeting, both sides expressed their intention to strengthen the relationship in several ways, be it as concerns the political dialogue, cooperation to enhance global and regional security, economic cooperation, development cooperation or cooperation in the field of energy security and climate change. Looking at this document, it seems as if EU-ASEAN relations are guided by a set of overlapping interests and by the conviction that certain regional and global challenges can only be successfully handled through inter-regional cooperation.


Prof. Dr. Borwornsak Uwanno and Ms. Yeo.

Prior to the EU-ASEAN foreign ministers meeting, the Konrad Adenauer Foundation and the Center for Applied Policy Research (C·A·P) jointly organized a roundtable discussion in Munich, assembling experts form South East Asia and Europe. At this occasion it became obvious that even though common declarations and documents put EU-ASEAN relations in a favourable light, there is no time for too much euphoria. In fact, relations between the two regional organizations are not as far developed as one could expect given their long history. Even though inter-regionalism had become a buzzword in the external relations of the European Union, the European Asia policy is still mainly focusing on China and – more recently – India.


Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Gottfried-Karl Kindermann, Dr. Noel Morada and Prof. Dr. Truong Huu Chi.

It is, however, not only due to the European side that EU-ASEAN relations need to be further improved. On behalf of ASEAN a lot remains to be done, too. The lacking consolidation of ASEAN is a major aspect in this regard. ASEAN developed in response to external pressure and has only recently taken on the challenge of organizing its intra-regional relations. Moreover, ASEAN as a political entity is not internalised by the member states’ peoples until now. Even the prominently discussed draft of an ASEAN-Charter is unlikely to change that. The fact that some of its member states still need to consolidate their statehood represents another obstacle for the organisation.


Dr. Franco Algieri and Dr. Peter Hefele.

Hence, for ASEAN to play a significant role in international relations would presuppose a consolidation of its member states. Moreover, regional integration would have to be felt among the people as an undertaking generating benefits for all. To attain these two goals ASEAN should focus its efforts on human development and poverty reduction. These issues should also be placed on top of the agenda for inter-regional cooperation between the European Union and ASEAN. Lessons from the European integration process can be helpful for Asian states to develop an adequate regional integration model. Vice versa a viable and stable partner in South East Asia would provide the European Union with political as well as economic alternatives in Asia. Therefore, it is about time for the European Union and its member states to rediscover their interest in ASEAN.

List of Participants

  1. Dr. Franco Algieri, Project Director, EU-Asia, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich

  2. Michael Bauer, Research Assistant, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich

  3. Thomas Bauer, Research Fellow, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich

  4. Florian Baumann, Research Assistant, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich

  5. Thomas Biechl, Research Assistant, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich

  6. Prof. Dr. Truong Huu Chi, Member of the Vietnamese National Assembly, President of the Vietnamese-German parliamentary friendship group, Hanoil, Vietnam

  7. Janis Emmanouilidis, Senior Research Fellow, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich

  8. Dr. Peter Hefele, Head of Division 2 Team Asia, International Cooperation, Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Berlin

  9. Dr. Muhammad A.S. Hikam, MA, Member of Parliament, Banten Province, Indonesia

  10. Dato Dr. Zambry Kadir, Member of Parliament, Pangkor District, Chairman of the Committee for Education, Human Resource and Multimedia, Ipoh, Malaysia

  11. Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Gottfried-Karl Kindermann, Geschwister-Scholl-Institute for Political Science, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich

  12. Prof. Dr. Horst-Günther Krenzler, former Director General of DG I "External Economic Relations", European Commission, Brussels

  13. Dr. Reinhard C. Meier-Walser, Director, Academy for Politics and Current Affairs, Hanns-Seidel-Foundation, Munich

  14. Dr. Noel Morada, Executive Director, Institute of Strategic and Development Studies (ISDS), Manila, Philippines

  15. Dr. Ulrike Reisach, Director Strategy & Trends, Corporate Development Strategy, Siemens AG, Munich

  16. Prof. Dr. Borwornsak Uwanno, former Secretary General of the Cabinet, Bangkok, Thailand

  17. Dr. Yeo Lay Hwee, Executive Director, Singapore Institute of International Affairs (SIIA), Singapore


News zum Thema


Weltpolitik – Analyse
Botschafter Mei Zhaorong am C·A·P
02.02.2016 · C·A·P

Besuch von der Parteihochschule in Peking am C·A·P
Dozenten treffen Prof. Dr. Werner Weidenfeld
10.11.2015 · C·A·P

Erneuter Besuch von Botschafter Mei am C·A·P
Politischer Austausch in München
23.10.2015 · C·A·P

no-img
Germany and China: Embracing a Different Kind of Partnership?
C·A·P Working Paper by Christoph Schnellbach & Joyce Man
21.09.2015 · C·A·P

no-img
European Studies Program - Visit from Taiwan
Dr. Fu-chang Chang at the C·A·P
18.07.2015 · C·A·P

Webdesign EGENCY München