Europe and Asia
Prospects and Challenges for the 21st Century -
8th Europe-East Asia Think Tank Dialogue in Munich
15.11.2006 · C·A·P & Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
|< Vorige News||Nächste News >|
The dialogue's participants
The first panel concentrated on international trade and finance. It was observed that the EU policy concerning this region could be best called "unbalanced bilateralism". So far, the Europeans focused primarily on China and Japan whereas the rest of the region was more or less left aside. In addition to this, the competition for economic advantages existing between the Member States, often inhibited a coherent European approach toward Asia. Moreover, especially in the implementation of economic sanctions, the EU was regularly applying double standards.
The participants agreed that the overall prospects for further economic growth in East-Asia remained considerably good, even though some key-risks remained: Most dangerous in this regard would be an economic slow-down in the USA, which could hardly be made up by a growing demand from Europe and Japan or domestic consumption. Further dangers might be a raise of inflation-rates, a further raising of energy prices, the weakness of the regions banking sector, political and social instabilities as well as a renewed outbreak of the bird flu.
Dr. Franco Algieri, Project Director, EU-Asia, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich, and Prakhar Shrama, Research Analyst International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Imbalances existed in the trade sector: While the EU accounted for 15-20 percent of the ASEAN exports, the ASEAN countries share of EU exports remained at a modest 5 percent. Nonetheless, shifts were identified in the trade and financial relations of two regions. After the failure of the Doha-round, the EU and ASEAN countries started negotiating bilateral trade-agreements. Moreover, the Asian countries were no longer focussing on labour intensive products only, but also on technology and research and development. Furthermore, the direction of the financial flows had become more diverse over the past few years. Whereas most of Europes major companies had already heavily invested in the region, European countries were trying to make themselves attractive for Asian direct investment. In addition, especially China emerged internationally as a net-creditor, financing for example the Triple deficit of the United States.
In the second panel European-Asian security relations as well as the security situation in East Asia were dicussed. In general, the European approach to the region was neither very coherent nor comprehensive. Similar to economic issues only China held a top place on the European agenda. Yet, given the internal conflicts several South East Asian countries had to handle with, the EU's expertise in peace-building activities was of high interest to them. Especially the European participants expressed doubts regarding the prospects for a strengthened EU profile in East Asia.
Mr Ridzam Deva (former Ambassador of Malaysia to the EU, Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) and Dr. Carolina G. Hernandez (Chairperson, Board of Directors, Institute for Strategic and Development Studies, Manila, Philippines).
However, apart from these soft security issues the rules of the game in East Asia were best expressed in terms of realpolitik and balance of power. The most important security actors were the United States and China so far.
Regarding a potential taming of the nuclear escalation on the Korean Peninsula, they expressed scepticism across the board. The North Korean regime showed increased self-confidence after the nuclear tests, and even China seemed to have lost influence on the government in Pyongyang. Moreover, Kim Jong-ils domestic position was stronger than ever since he shifted his power-base from the communist party to the military.
In a final discussion round the participants agreed that Europe and East Asia were facing a wide range of challenges in the early 21st century, which could be tackled best through internationally coordinated efforts. For such cooperation both sides had to enter into further the political and intellectual discussions to increase their mutual understanding.
List of Participants
- Dr. Franco Algieri, Project Director, EU-Asia, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich
- Dr. Do van Bach, Deputy Director General, Institute for International Relations (IIR), Hanoi, Vietnam
- Michael Bauer, Research Assistant, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich
- Dr. Colin Dürkop, Regional Representative, Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Singapore
- Dr. Carolina G. Hernandez, Chairperson, Board of Directors, Institute for Strategic and Development Studies (ISDS), Manila, Philippines
- Dr. Martin Hüfner, former Chief Economist, Hypo-Vereinsbank, Munich
- Clara Joewono, Vice Chair, Board of Directors, Centre for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), Jakarta, Indonesia
- Prof. Dr. Gottfried-Karl Kindermann, Geschwister-Scholl-Institute for Political Science, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
- Prof. Dr. Horst-Günther Krenzler, former Director General of DG I "External Economic Relations", European Commission, Brussels
- Dr. Lai Hongyi, Research Fellow, East Asian Institute, Singapore
- Amb. Lee Ho-Jin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Dr. Reinhard C. Meier-Walser, Director, Academy for Politics and Current Affairs, Hanns-Seidel-Foundation, Munich
- Almut Metz, Research Fellow, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich
- Kristina Notz, Programme Manager, Improving Responsiveness, Center for Applied Policy Research, Munich
- Edeltraud Rattenhuber, Journalist, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Munich
- Dr. Ulrike Reisach, Director Strategy & Trends, Corporate Development Strategy, Siemens, Munich
- Dr. Renato Reside, Institute for Strategic and International Studies (ISIS), Bangkok, Thailand
- Dato Deva Mohd Ridzam, former Ambassador of Malaysia to the EU, Institute for Strategic and International Studies (ISIS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Prakhar Shrama, Research Analyst International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Dr. Charit Tingsabath, Institute for Strategic and International Studies (ISIS), Bangkok, Thailand
- Dr. Yeo Lay Hwee, Executive Director, Singapore Institute of International Affairs (SIIA), Singapore
News zum Thema
Modul 2 der zertifizierten Betzavta-Ausbildung.
Fortbildung für Multiplikator/inn/en der Demokratiepädagogik
Gespräche zu kontroversen politischen Themen initiieren und begleiten. Seminarreihe für Mulitplikator*innen in der Bildungs- und Gemeindearbeit.
Modul 1 der zertifizierten Trainer/innen - Ausbildung
Modul 2 der zertifizierten Betzavta-Ausbildung.